The shop is closed just now. The shop is not open for orders yet. Everything here is real and grown in my own yard — have a look around — but I am not taking money until the last few things are in place. Ask about a plant

Mysterious Yard
Cart, empty
JS336 Jessica seal. Plain ring: nothing here sets a rib count, a spine length or a growth form the ring can mark.

Other Trichocereus

JS336 Jessica

Partially documented

Also written as JS336

JS336 Jessica is known mainly for its flowers: growers describe a large bloom that yields freely, which is why the gets passed around breeding circles. Its origin is not documented, and the prefix is one collector's own numbering. Two other plants also circulate as Jessica, a and a , and nobody has established whether any of them are the same.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

  • large flowers
  • free pollen
  • unclear origin

Other TrichocereusField-collection code: A collector's accession number — initials and a number — rather than a nickname.

Of the 9 things this page says, 3 name who reports them and 6 are marked as something we cannot confirm. Where a line is not settled, it says so underneath.

Added 23 Aug 2026

At a glance

Species

Not recorded

No source named a species for this one.

Filed under Other Trichocereus

Parents

Not recorded

No source names a mother or a father for this one.

Origin

Told in the writing

No origin line of its own on file. What our sources do say about where it came from is in the account above.

no source says whether it is seed-grown or a cutting line

In the yard

Not in the yardAsk if you are after one

Family line

what the record holds

No source in this library records a cross for JS336 Jessica. Nobody names a mother or a father for it, and no other entry here names it as a parent.

That is the record, not an oversight: of the 749 names in this library, 693 have no recorded relation either. Most named clones were selected, cut and passed along without anyone writing down what they came out of. A parent goes in here when a source states it and never because a name looks like one — a wrong pedigree would travel further than a blank one, because pedigrees get copied.

If you know where it came from, tell us — a person reads everything before it appears.

The longer version

The JS prefix marks one grower or collector's own numbering.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

At least two other plants circulate as Jessica: a pachanoi that growers guess came from Misplant, and a peruvianus described as an old T-nest clone.Reported by 2 independent sources; we have not seen it ourselves.

A Californian nursery growing this code describes it as a Southern Californian pachanoi capable of near-spineless growth, and says its own clone came from an eBay seller at La Puente in California.Reported by 2 independent sources; we have not seen it ourselves.It also states plainly that the plant is sometimes confused with, but is definitely not, the pachanoi called Jessica by another grower.Reported, but not confirmed.That is one interested party taking a position on the question the wiki page leaves open, which is worth recording and is not the same as the question being settled.Reported by one source, and not corroborated anywhere else.

What the record holds

The breeding history behind the code is not known.Reported, but not confirmed.

Character

A bar is drawn only where one of the lines below states it — never from the species, never from a photograph.

  • Not documented yet.

  • Not documented yet.

  • Not documented yet.

Notes
It flowers large and gives plenty of pollen, which is how most growers encounter it.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

What the sources say

Nobody has established whether JS336 Jessica is the same plant as the pachanoi or peruvianus clones sharing the Jessica name.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

Drawing of two plain Trichocereus columns of different heights, standing for the wider genus rather than one plant.
A Trichocereus column, drawn. We don't grow this one, and we will not borrow anybody else's photograph of it.

Filed under the same family, Other Trichocereus. The better-documented ones come first.

Keep exploring

Cultivar histories in this hobby are passed between growers; where sources disagree we say so rather than pick a side.