The shop is closed just now. The shop is not open for orders yet. Everything here is real and grown in my own yard — have a look around — but I am not taking money until the last few things are in place. Ask about a plant

Mysterious Yard
Cart, empty
OzJuuls seal. Plain ring: nothing here sets a rib count, a spine length or a growth form the ring can mark.

Other Trichocereus

OzJuuls

Partially documented

OzJuuls is well liked and badly documented: collectors call it a favourite while admitting that nobody knows who bred it or where it came from. What is on record is visual — clean green , clear and fairly short spines, with one grower saying it recalls the of Ecuador. A plant treated as the mother is in one collector's care, and pass between growers, so the name is in genuine circulation even though its history is not.Reported, but not confirmed.

  • green skin
  • short spines
  • distinct areoles

Other TrichocereusNamed clone: One original plant and every cutting taken from it, given a name by a grower.

Of the 10 things this page says, 1 names who reports it and 9 are marked as something we cannot confirm. Where a line is not settled, it says so underneath.

Added 23 Aug 2026

At a glance

Species

Not recorded

No botanical name on file. What the sources do say about its species is in the writing below.

Filed under Other Trichocereus

Parents

Not recorded

No source names a mother or a father for this one.

Origin

No record found

We have read the sources we hold and none of them says where this plant came from.

no source says whether it is seed-grown or a cutting line

In the yard

Not in the yardAsk if you are after one

Family line

what the record holds

No source in this library records a cross for OzJuuls. Nobody names a mother or a father for it, and no other entry here names it as a parent.

That is the record, not an oversight: of the 749 names in this library, 693 have no recorded relation either. Most named clones were selected, cut and passed along without anyone writing down what they came out of. A parent goes in here when a source states it and never because a name looks like one — a wrong pedigree would travel further than a blank one, because pedigrees get copied.

If you know where it came from, tell us — a person reads everything before it appears.

The longer version

Species, as our sources record it: ; the wiki page compares it to Ecuadorian T. pachanoi and gives pachanoi care, without asserting a species.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

A plant recognised as the mother is grown and shared by the collector Cakti Spinez.Reported, but not confirmed.

The circulates actively between growers — one collector is recorded passing a specimen on to another.Reported, but not confirmed.

What the record holds

Where the clone came from, who bred it and how it was found are all undocumented, and the wiki page says the history is obscure even to well-known collectors of it.Reported, but not confirmed.

Character

A bar is drawn only where one of the lines below states it — never from the species, never from a photograph.

  • Not documented yet.

  • Not documented yet.

  • Not documented yet.

Skin
Clean and green, on community observation rather than measurement.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.
Notes
areoles and spines: distinct areoles with fairly short .One source states this, and our house botanist has checked it. Distinct areoles with short spines fall well within the normal range for the genus.appearance: one grower says it puts them in mind of the pachanoi they have seen in Ecuador.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

What the sources say

The wiki page carries a banner saying it was assembled by a bot from community chat and has not been checked by an editor. No species is asserted: the resemblance to Ecuadorian pachanoi is a grower's impression, and the wiki page hangs its care advice on that impression rather than on an identification.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

Drawing of two plain Trichocereus columns of different heights, standing for the wider genus rather than one plant.
A Trichocereus column, drawn. We don't grow this one, and we will not borrow anybody else's photograph of it.

Filed under the same family, Other Trichocereus. The better-documented ones come first.

Keep exploring

Cultivar histories in this hobby are passed between growers; where sources disagree we say so rather than pick a side.