Other Trichocereus
Vilcabamba
Partially documentedVilcabamba is a locality name covering more than one accession collected from wild plants in Ecuador, two of which a German grower brought back in 1990. Vilcabamba 2 is the one described: smooth and near-spineless enough to be mistaken for a , but different in , ribs, , flowers and fruit. A parallel set of A and B designations exists, and whether they overlap with 1 and 2 is unresolved.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.
- scop lookalike
- near spineless
- wild Ecuador line
At a glance
Species
Parents
No source names a mother or a father for this one.
Origin
no source says whether it is seed-grown or a cutting line
In the yard
Family line
No source in this library records a cross for Vilcabamba. Nobody names a mother or a father for it, and no other entry here names it as a parent.
The longer version
A German grower collected two there in 1990 and carried them to Germany, and those became Vilcabamba 1 and 2 in collections.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.
Separate designations Vilcabamba A and B also circulate, associated with a different collector, and the wiki page speculates that B and 2 may be the same plant.Reported, but not confirmed.
Its collection site sits beside an Inca highway, the Qhapac Nan, which historically carried a great deal of traffic between Vilcabamba and Huancabamba.Reported, but not confirmed.
A California nursery that grows it agrees on the country and adds the step in between: the it sells as Vilcabamba B came out of Pedro Park's garden in Spain.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.It separates the Ecuadorian look — white areoles, notching, a darker skin tone — from the smoother, shorter-spined Peruvian one.Reported, but not confirmed.
Where the name comes from
The plants come from wild populations near Vilcabamba, Ecuador.Reported by 2 independent sources; we have not seen it ourselves.
Character
Not documented yet.
Not documented yet.
Not documented yet.
- Notes
- Vilcabamba 2 looks superficially like a scopulicola, being mostly spineless and smooth, but differs in skin texture, shape, areole structure and its flowers and fruit.One source states this, and our house botanist has checked it. Flowering is normal for the genus, and the sources agree its flowers differ from a lookalike.
What the sources say
Two numbering systems - 1 and 2 versus A and B - are in use for plants from the same locality, and the wiki page can only guess that B and 2 might be the same clone. The wiki page is bot-compiled and unverified.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.
Related names
Keep exploring
Cultivar histories in this hobby are passed between growers; where sources disagree we say so rather than pick a side.