The shop is closed just now. The shop is not open for orders yet. Everything here is real and grown in my own yard — have a look around — but I am not taking money until the last few things are in place. Ask about a plant

Trichocereus Singapora seal. Plain ring: nothing here sets a rib count, a spine length or a growth form the ring can mark.

Name only

Trichocereus Singapora

Name only

Also written as Singapora

Singapora is an obscure name with an honest page behind it: the wiki says plainly that no description and no history exist for it. Even the apparent hint at Singapore in the name is flagged as unverified. Growers recognise the name and can add nothing to it.Reported, but not confirmed.

Other TrichocereusInformal label: Shorthand or a describing label rather than a cultivar name. It does not promise one specific plant.

Of the 5 things this page says, 5 are marked as something we cannot confirm. Where a line is not settled, it says so underneath.

Added 23 Aug 2026

At a glance

Species

Not recorded

No source named a species for this one.

Filed under Other Trichocereus

Parents

Not recorded

No source names a mother or a father for this one.

Origin

No record found

We have read the sources we hold and none of them says where this plant came from.

no source says whether it is seed-grown or a cutting line

In the yard

Family line

what the record holds

No source in this library records a cross for Trichocereus Singapora. Nobody names a mother or a father for it, and no other entry here names it as a parent.

That is the record, not an oversight: of the 749 names in this library, 693 have no recorded relation either. Most named clones were selected, cut and passed along without anyone writing down what they came out of. A parent goes in here when a source states it and never because a name looks like one — a wrong pedigree would travel further than a blank one, because pedigrees get copied.

If you know where it came from, tell us — a person reads everything before it appears.

The longer version

The wiki page notes only that the name hints at a link to Singapore, and that nobody has verified it.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

What the record holds

No origin, breeder or introduction history is recorded for this name.Reported, but not confirmed.

Character

A bar is drawn only where one of the lines below states it — never from the species, never from a photograph.

  • Not documented yet.

  • Not documented yet.

  • Not documented yet.

Notes
The wiki page states outright that no count, spacing, spine detail or colour has ever been documented for this .Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

What the sources say

The wiki page records that the only community members who spoke about it could offer no detail, which is why it holds no citations.Too little stands behind this for us to confirm it.

Drawing of two plain Trichocereus columns of different heights, standing for the wider genus rather than one plant.
A Trichocereus column, drawn. We don't grow this one, and we will not borrow anybody else's photograph of it.

Filed under the same family, Other Trichocereus. The better-documented ones come first.

Keep exploring

Cultivar histories in this hobby are passed between growers; where sources disagree we say so rather than pick a side.